A. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/21/AR2010022104079.html
(It got right to the point of the article, to me, it told me the who, what, when, and how.) Washington Post, Monday February 22, 2010, Metro, Front Page.
B. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2010/02/16/ST2010021604514.html
( It had a nice little story in the beginning, then went right into cooking in the fire place) Washington Post, Wednesday February 17, 2010, Food.
C. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/21/AR2010022103204.html
( Although its not the first sentence of the paragraph there is a question that leads into the story.) Washington Post, Monday February 22, 2010, Local Business.
D. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/21/AR2010022103943.html?hpid=dynamiclead
“The day before Roger Greenberg, a then-66-year-old ex-con, married Evelyn Zucker, a then-83-year-old invalid widow, he wrote a note to his bride-to-be.”
(It started out with a less interesting introduction then what the story actually is. Read onto the third paragraph, now thats an will catch someones eye). Also if that link does not work, its in the Washington Post, Monday February 22, 2010, Metro Section, Front Page.
Good choices, but don’t forget to include the actual leads so we can read them. And make those URLs links. 4/5.